|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Dom Arkaral
Gate Is Red
Complaints Department
59
   |
Posted - 2016.02.12 14:37:34 -
[1] - Quote
A lot of people (AG) will.quit the game out of boredom if CODE. stops the ganking.
They just don't realize that yet
Edit: Expanded Cargoholds should need a bigger hull hp penalty to compensate for this.
On the other hand, CCP should only do a tiercide and leave hull bonuses out of this.
You're buffing idiots when you shouldn't. They need education, death is that education.
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker
I have no Honer (truly)
Attache ta tuque avec d'la broche!
Ich bin krank! (I don't speak German don't bother)
|
Dom Arkaral
Gate Is Red
Complaints Department
59
|
Posted - 2016.02.12 15:00:15 -
[2] - Quote
Makkuro Tatsu wrote:Dom Arkaral wrote:You're buffing idiots when you shouldn't. They need education, death is that education. Ah, there is nothing quite like the arrogance of players with a parasitic gameplay style lashing out mindlessly at players who enjoy a different style of gameplay.
If you fly expensive junk, you should know that there's a big target on your head.
It's your own fault if you die in a pvp game about pvp (note that this isn't WOW or runescape where you have dedicated pvp zones)
CCP shouldn't adapt the game for those who don't want to learn from their mistakes. (Something they're clearly doing now)
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker
I have no Honer (truly)
Attache ta tuque avec d'la broche!
Ich bin krank! (I don't speak German don't bother)
|
Dom Arkaral
Gate Is Red
Complaints Department
59
|
Posted - 2016.02.12 15:30:45 -
[3] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Dom Arkaral wrote:If you fly expensive junk, you should know that there's a big target on your head. And you still will. Of course I will, I'm aware of my surroundings and I tank my stuff (because no tank = no ship) Dom Arkaral wrote:CCP shouldn't adapt the game for those who don't want to learn from their mistakes. (Something they're clearly doing now) Nope, they're just levelling out the balance a bit.
Buff the idiots
Nerf those that are aware of their surroundings
Good trade
@CCP, I'd love to know the percentage of dead freighters/ jf that die due to being AFK
And the percentage of freighters/ jf that only use cargo expanders
I'd enjoy knowing those numbers and showing you that most people use expanders and therefore paint a big "kill me" on their hull
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker
I have no Honer (truly)
Attache ta tuque avec d'la broche!
Ich bin krank! (I don't speak German don't bother)
|
Dom Arkaral
Gate Is Red
Complaints Department
59
|
Posted - 2016.02.12 15:40:46 -
[4] - Quote
Big Mama Daft wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Big Mama Daft wrote:
Sounds legit. 50 catalysts x 1.1 mil each = 55 mil
This could not be more dishonest. You do realize that you're just claiming the hull cost, right? Nevermind that isk tanking should never be a thing, especially in highsec, but I just wanted to point out that you're a liar. I stand corrected -- they're 2.06 mil on ZKill. Don't you liar me for such a small transgression LOL
A 100% transgression is never small
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker
I have no Honer (truly)
Attache ta tuque avec d'la broche!
Ich bin krank! (I don't speak German don't bother)
|
Dom Arkaral
Gate Is Red
Complaints Department
59
|
Posted - 2016.02.12 15:43:13 -
[5] - Quote
Sissy Fuzz wrote:Globby wrote:The only buffs to ganking was the removal of wreck shooting, which was to be honest a "low investment high damage uncounterable game mechanic" that rightfully was removed. Nice logic, sir. Let's see bumping nerfed then. You know the completely asymmetric mechanic that allows a single bumper to freeze indefinetely a 5bil freighter in a high-risk situation, AP or not. While the -10 gank fleet pilots waltz in when they are good and ready after napping or taking a leak, to be "exposed" maybe 30-45 seconds before the gank. They are not really exposed, of course, since they are warping around most of the time. Bumping is an offensive act that like a point interferes with another player's freedom of movement. That should carry some implication as any other offensive act - bumper going suspect, in think. Even if the bumper gets wasted, the whole event is still abnormously skewed, ISK-wise. But it would raise the complexity for the gankers to a level that matches the outcome. In before "ganking is elite pvp as it is complicated and requires enormous amounts of planning and skill". Nope, not so. High-sec ganking is a no-brainer and still much too easy.
Bumpers go suspect..
The game can't magically guess who is the bumper and the bumper ;)
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker
I have no Honer (truly)
Attache ta tuque avec d'la broche!
Ich bin krank! (I don't speak German don't bother)
|
Dom Arkaral
Gate Is Red
Complaints Department
59
|
Posted - 2016.02.12 19:23:05 -
[6] - Quote
X Gallentius wrote:Shouldn't you want the DCU to emphasize hull at the expense of shield/armor?
Counter Proposal: Shift shield/armor resistance increase to hull resistance increase.
1. Increase DCU resistance a bit from this current proposal so that the total EHP of ships stays about the same.
2. Decrease or remove shield/armor resistances to armor/shield.
Reason: Armor dudes have EANM's. Shield dudes have Power Diagnostic Systems.
Shields have invuln you mean?
And I do have to agree on the proposal to remove/lower armor and shield bonuses whilst favoring hull resist.
I wouldn't buff any ship resist profile as the balance would pretty much dissappear
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker
I have no Honer (truly)
Attache ta tuque avec d'la broche!
Ich bin krank! (I don't speak German don't bother)
|
Dom Arkaral
Gate Is Red
Complaints Department
59
|
Posted - 2016.02.12 20:26:09 -
[7] - Quote
Moac Tor wrote:Alexis Nightwish wrote:This is actually a pretty great change, especially the passive module-ness!
However, for the love of Bob, PLEASE make the Compact DC use 17 CPU instead of 20! I have a LOT of ships that currently use the Internal Force Field Array which is 17 CPU and this will totally break them with no alternative (way overpriced Radicals or **** Civilians are not alternatives). If you need to drop the resist benefit a tiny bit to justify reducing the CPU by 3 I'm totally fine with that. You might have missed the news, but you don't need the DC anymore. Throw it away and put on a tracking enhancer or something similar, if you really insist on the extra resists then you now have to make a sacrifice elsewhere. I don't think some people are quite getting how fundamental this change really is going to be to ship fitting. You could basically minus a low slot on every fit as you knew it that was where the DC would go and you would be stupid to think otherwise (barring a few niche fits).
You don't sacrifice anything if you only had the DC bonus
Sure you can get more options, but a DC will still be the better option for most fits
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker
I have no Honer (truly)
Attache ta tuque avec d'la broche!
Ich bin krank! (I don't speak German don't bother)
|
Dom Arkaral
Gate Is Red
Complaints Department
59
|
Posted - 2016.02.13 00:53:39 -
[8] - Quote
Violet Crumble wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Violet Crumble wrote:This change for example has no benefit for people that currently treat hauling as a group activity and use webbing assistance. Of course there's a benefit. A web doesn't make you immune, just a less favourable target. Having the additional defense is a definite positive. AFK haulers will still be the primary targets and will still get ganked. Sure Lucas. Whatever you say. No one has ever had a different opinion that is also valid. There is no benefit to me from this change, since I don't rely on the EHP of my ship in order to be a deterrent to ganking. That is also true of anyone else that uses webs. We don't use the EHP of our ship to be safe. And yes, of course AFK haulers will still be the primary target of gankers. I didn't say anything different. The balance is still changed though for a situation that doesn't ever currently benefit from a Damage Control. Balancing damage controls is resulting in a massive boost to ships that can't even fit them now.
Don't mind our friend Lucas here,
I totally agree with you
Afk don't need a buff
It'll just attract more bots
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker
I have no Honer (truly)
Attache ta tuque avec d'la broche!
Ich bin krank! (I don't speak German don't bother)
|
Dom Arkaral
Gate Is Red
Complaints Department
59
|
Posted - 2016.02.13 20:46:11 -
[9] - Quote
this thread keeps on going in circles
MAKE PROPOSITIONS FFS
I'm out of this cancer thread
Merc. Tear Gatherer. Quebecker
I have no Honer (truly)
Attache ta tuque avec d'la broche!
Ich bin krank! (I don't speak German don't bother)
|
|
|
| |
|